header-logo header-logo

01 August 2013 / Philip Sissons
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Putting on the breaks

Philip Sissons discusses the issue of recovering rent after the exercise of a break clause

After a series of decisions in which the High Court has repeatedly found for landlords in respect of the proper construction of break clauses conditional upon payment of rent down to the break date, the decision of Mr Justice Morgan in Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas [2013] EWHC 1279, [2013] All ER (D) 214 (May) provides some comfort for tenants who have managed to comply with that condition. In Marks & Spencer, Morgan J decided that a tenant who had validly exercised a break clause was entitled to recover sums paid in respect of a period after the determination of the lease. The judgment also considers the proper test to be applied when a party contends that a term should be implied into a lease and is also, therefore, of broader significance beyond this specific situation.

Rent payment

Break clauses included in modern commercial leases invariably include, as a pre-condition to the effective operation of the break,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll