header-logo header-logo

Putting on the breaks

01 August 2013 / Philip Sissons
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Philip Sissons discusses the issue of recovering rent after the exercise of a break clause

After a series of decisions in which the High Court has repeatedly found for landlords in respect of the proper construction of break clauses conditional upon payment of rent down to the break date, the decision of Mr Justice Morgan in Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas [2013] EWHC 1279, [2013] All ER (D) 214 (May) provides some comfort for tenants who have managed to comply with that condition. In Marks & Spencer, Morgan J decided that a tenant who had validly exercised a break clause was entitled to recover sums paid in respect of a period after the determination of the lease. The judgment also considers the proper test to be applied when a party contends that a term should be implied into a lease and is also, therefore, of broader significance beyond this specific situation.

Rent payment

Break clauses included in modern commercial leases invariably include, as a pre-condition to the effective operation of the break,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll