header-logo header-logo

Odd one out

01 August 2013 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
istock_000006128063large

Jon Holbrook fears the emergence of a disturbing new tort of intolerance

In recent years, a new cause of action has come to the fore that seeks to enforce intolerance. It gives rise to civil claims with very severe consequences, including the loss of a job. Recent defendants who have suffered this way include Lillian Ladele, the Islington registrar who refused to perform same sex registrations, Gary McFarlane, the counsellor who refused to give sex therapy to homosexuals, and Mr and Mrs Bull and Susanne Wilkinson, who refused to allow unmarried couples to share the same bed in their bed and breakfast establishments.

Non-conformist views

The tort of intolerance can be deployed against those who merely express non-conformist opinions. Dr Hans-Christian Raabe was sacked from his post as a government drugs adviser for having previously expressed anti-gay views in a paper entitled Gay marriage and Homosexuality: some medical comments.

Although the tort of intolerance is often crystallised by a clash between Christianity and homosexuality, other non-conformist beliefs can be targeted. When Arthur Redfearn’s membership

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll