header-logo header-logo

01 August 2013 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Odd one out

istock_000006128063large

Jon Holbrook fears the emergence of a disturbing new tort of intolerance

In recent years, a new cause of action has come to the fore that seeks to enforce intolerance. It gives rise to civil claims with very severe consequences, including the loss of a job. Recent defendants who have suffered this way include Lillian Ladele, the Islington registrar who refused to perform same sex registrations, Gary McFarlane, the counsellor who refused to give sex therapy to homosexuals, and Mr and Mrs Bull and Susanne Wilkinson, who refused to allow unmarried couples to share the same bed in their bed and breakfast establishments.

Non-conformist views

The tort of intolerance can be deployed against those who merely express non-conformist opinions. Dr Hans-Christian Raabe was sacked from his post as a government drugs adviser for having previously expressed anti-gay views in a paper entitled Gay marriage and Homosexuality: some medical comments.

Although the tort of intolerance is often crystallised by a clash between Christianity and homosexuality, other non-conformist beliefs can be targeted. When Arthur Redfearn’s membership

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll