header-logo header-logo

Transfer deadline

01 August 2013 / John McMullen
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail
rexfeatures_1304467z

John McMullen talks TUPE & service provision change

It is a pre-requisite for a service provision change TUPE transfer that there is, immediately before the service provision change, an organised grouping of employees which has, as its principal purpose, the carrying out of activities on behalf of the client concerned (Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246), reg 3(3)(a)(i)).

Client service

In Eddie Stobart Ltd v Moreman UKEAT/0223/11, [2012] IRLR 356 it was held by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) that an “organised grouping of employees” means a client team put together by the service provider specifically to serve the client for whom the service is provided.

Eddie Stobart Limited is a warehousing and logistics service provider. It had 35 employees at one site in Nottinghamshire, servicing at least five clients. The contracts reduced to two, the principle one relating to a customer called Vion. Eddie Stobart closed the site. FJG Logistics Limited acquired the Vion work. Eddie Stobart took the view that all employees engaged wholly or for 50%

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll