header-logo header-logo

01 August 2013 / John McMullen
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

Transfer deadline

rexfeatures_1304467z

John McMullen talks TUPE & service provision change

It is a pre-requisite for a service provision change TUPE transfer that there is, immediately before the service provision change, an organised grouping of employees which has, as its principal purpose, the carrying out of activities on behalf of the client concerned (Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246), reg 3(3)(a)(i)).

Client service

In Eddie Stobart Ltd v Moreman UKEAT/0223/11, [2012] IRLR 356 it was held by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) that an “organised grouping of employees” means a client team put together by the service provider specifically to serve the client for whom the service is provided.

Eddie Stobart Limited is a warehousing and logistics service provider. It had 35 employees at one site in Nottinghamshire, servicing at least five clients. The contracts reduced to two, the principle one relating to a customer called Vion. Eddie Stobart closed the site. FJG Logistics Limited acquired the Vion work. Eddie Stobart took the view that all employees engaged wholly or for 50%

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll