header-logo header-logo

Covenants: hostile to home working?

09 June 2023 / Michael Ranson , Taylor Briggs
Issue: 8028 / Categories: Features , Property , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
125550
The rise of home working has created an uncertain landscape for property practitioners: Michael Ranson & Taylor Briggs report on ‘business use’ &  the modification of restrictive covenants
  • Hodgson v Cook is a recent Upper Tribunal authority on the interrelationship between home working and covenants preventing business use.
  • This article explores that case and the tribunal’s jurisdiction to modify or discharge such covenants.

The COVID-19 pandemic brought about numerous changes to our daily lives, one of which was in respect of our working habits. According to the Office for National Statistics, despite ‘work from home’ guidance having been lifted as long ago as January 2022, almost a third of working adults reported that they worked partly at home and partly in an office elsewhere, with over 15% working from home exclusively, between September 2022 and January 2023.

This raises a range of legal issues, including data protection compliance, buildings and contents insurance requirements, planning control and the tax treatment of homes which have now become,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll