header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Funding boost for advice services

24 June 2020
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Legal News , Charities , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
The Community Justice Fund, which launched six weeks ago, has already awarded grants worth nearly £1.9m to legal advice charities in need, it has been announced

The Community Justice Fund, which launched six weeks ago, has already awarded grants worth nearly £1.9m to legal advice charities in need, it has been announced

The Fund was set up on 12 May by the Access to Justice Foundation (AJF) and five other leading social justice funders to help not-for-profit legal advice organisations be effective and sustainable in the face of responding to COVID-19.

Grants of £10,000-£75,000 have been awarded to 35 charities supporting disadvantaged and vulnerable people across the UK, in areas such as: disability, employment, housing, immigration women’s rights, benefits, debt and welfare.

For example, the Brighton Housing Trust, which helps house the homeless in the south-east, received £72,000 to ensure it remained open during the pandemic.

Shelter Cymru, which assists those with housing problems in Wales, helping to prevent homelessness in 86% of cases where it was threatened, received £75,000 to help mitigate loss of income since 1 April and keep services at full capacity, and help it cope with anticipated increased demand caused by the pandemic. Youth Legal and Resource Centre, which gives advice to vulnerable and destitute children and families, care leavers and carers, received £25,000 to help replace the loss of legal aid income during the pandemic.

Ruth Daniel, CEO of the AJF, said: ‘We have tried to make the application process as straightforward and streamlined as possible to provide the vital financial support that the not-for-profit legal advice sector needs as quickly as possible.

‘We are working hard to issue multiple grants every week and strongly encourage applications from specialist legal advice charities across the UK who need urgent and flexible financial assistance to stay open and sustainable at this time of crisis.’

Charities in receipt of grants so far have included: Child Poverty Action Group, Disability Law Service, Brighton Housing Trust (BHT), Welsh Housing Aid (trading as Shelter Cymru), Mary Ward Legal Centre, JustRight Scotland, Just for Kids Law, Norfolk Community Law Service Ltd (NCLS), Advice on Individual Rights in Europe Ltd (The AIRE Centre) and Independent Provider of Special Education Advice (IPSEA).

Issue: 7893 / Categories: Legal News , Charities , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll