header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Evictions on hold during virus emergency?

18 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail
The Prime Minister has told MPs the government will legislate to protect renters in the private sector from eviction during the virus outbreak

Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions in a sparsely attended House of Commons this week, PM Johnson told Opposition Leader Jeremy Corbyn MP that he would legislate to protect private renters from eviction.

In response to a later request from Siobhain McDonagh MP that he tell the courts to stop s 21 evictions under the Housing Act 1988, the PM said he would be bringing forward legislation to address this point.

Commenting on the proposals, Mark Steggles, partner at law firm Thomson Snell & Passmore said:  "The purpose behind the legislation is to take the pressure off tenants who cannot afford to pay rent as a result of not receiving any income in the current climate.

“Responding to concerns about the impact this may have on landlords, the government confirmed that the 3 month mortgage payment holiday plans announced earlier in the week will now be extended to landlords whose tenants fall into the above category, such as landlords with buy-to-let mortgages.  This avoids the financial pressure being passed from the tenant straight to the landlord and is a shift in government policy.

“The obvious concern is that this doesn’t solve the issue; it simply pushes the issue down the road for 3 months.  To combat this, the government suggests that the legislation will provide that after the 3 month period has expired, landlords and tenants will be expected to work together to establish an affordable repayment plan taking into account the tenants’ individual circumstances.  Further guidance on this point will follow. 

“It appears that possession proceedings that have already been issued will still continue (albeit access to the court for hearings may well be restricted in the coming months) but even if possession orders are obtained, enforcing such orders may prove difficult.  It is also currently unclear whether this legislation will extend to possession proceedings that are unconnected to payment of rent e.g. if the tenant is causing a nuisance.

“The measures proposed by the government will come as a relief to tenants and the fact that the measures for mortgage holidays will also be extended to Buy to Let landlords is sensible.  However, this approach risks storing up trouble when this crisis is over because the interests of the tenant, the landlord and the lender will conflict at that time”.

 

 

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll