header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Guidance for domestic abuse sufferers

03 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19 , Criminal , Family
printer mail-detail
Vital guidance has been issued for members of the public applying for a domestic abuse injunction

The guidance explains how a person who seeks protection must now apply to the court for an injunction by email or post, rather than in person.

HM Courts and Tribunals issued the guidance at the invitation of Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division.

Sir Andrew said the guidance was ‘timely’ as he was ‘concerned that there might be an enhanced need for the Family Court to provide protection from domestic abuse for children and adults during this period of family lockdown’.

Domestic abuse charities such as Women’s Aid have warned that COVID-19 will have a serious impact on abuse victims, who may be isolated with the perpetrator.

Sir Andrew said: ‘Despite the current difficult circumstances, the Family Court is continuing to hear and determine cases but, in line with public health guidelines to support COVID 19, almost all Family Court hearings are now being conducted remotely over the telephone or via video-link, without the physical attendance of any people at court.’

The guidance can be found here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll