header-logo header-logo

Court delays weigh heavily on children

12 September 2025
Categories: Legal News , Family , In Court
printer mail-detail
Chronic delays, duplication of work, cancelled hearings and inefficiencies in the family law courts are letting children and victims of domestic abuse down, a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) inquiry has found

Despite a statutory requirement for most public law cases to complete within 26 weeks, more than 4,000 children waited longer than 100 weeks in December 2024. In London, cases last 53 weeks on average. Nearly one third of all public law family cases have at least one hearing cancelled.

The PAC’s Family court services report, published this week, highlights the consequences of such delays—family situations often change before the case concludes, leading to a need for more expert reports and more court hearings. The PAC found the delays weigh heavily on children, particularly where domestic abuse is involved, yet the government’s understanding of the impact ‘remains poor’. Moreover, the PAC’s inquiry heard concerns that court staff, advisors and Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) staff are poorly resourced and insufficiently trained to support abuse victims.

One reason for the delays is a shortage of district judges and social workers, yet the departments concerned have ‘not systematically assessed what capacity would be required’ to meet demand. However, the PAC notes HM Courts and Services plan to recruit 80 district judges specifically for London and the South East to boost numbers.

It makes six recommendations in the report, including for ministers, HMCTS and Cafcass to clarify the capacity required and how and by when it will resolve the lack of judges and social workers, including details for locations where shortages are most acute.

It recommends a plan and timeline for the rollout of pathfinder courts within the next 12 months. It also calls on ministers to ‘make a system-wide assessment’ of inefficiencies, show how their departments will collect better data and provide clear plans in the next three months for improving timeliness overall.

Clive Betts MP, deputy chair of the PAC, said: ‘Every submission contributed to a picture of a system badly letting down the children and families that it is there to serve.

‘Alarmingly, when challenged on unacceptable waiting times in the system, government fell back on defending moderate improvements since the pandemic, rather than appreciating the urgent need for reform glaringly obvious to court users… complacency is not an option.’

CILEX President Sara Fowler welcomed the recommendations and called on the government to ‘take urgent action’.

Sarah Norman-Scott, family lawyer at Hodge Jones & Allen, said the justice system was ‘not providing timely protection to often vulnerable children, undermining public trust in the system and potentially leading to an escalation of harm with children and victims of domestic abuse put at risk.

‘The justice system risks becoming part of the problem rather than the solution, with the re-traumatisation of families that are already facing considerable challenges and the minimising of their experiences. Reforms need to be made urgently and must be properly funded.’

Chair of the Bar Council Barbara Mills KC said: ‘We are pleased to see a comprehensive set of recommendations to combat the myriad of issues plaguing the system, and ensure timely, effective, sustainable child-centred justice.’

Categories: Legal News , Family , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Chronic delays, duplication of work, cancelled hearings and inefficiencies in the family law courts are letting children and victims of domestic abuse down, a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) inquiry has found
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
back-to-top-scroll