header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Guidance for parents confused about access

25 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-detail
Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, has issued guidance to resolve confusion on child arrangement orders during the COVID-19 pandemic

Parents whose children are subject to the orders have been unsure what to do, given that children moving between households could exacerbate the spread of the virus.

Government guidance issued alongside the Stay at Home rules that children under 18 ‘can be moved between their parents’ homes’, Sir Andrew said. However, this exception did not mean that children ‘must be moved between homes’.

Parents, acting in agreement, are free to vary an order during this time, and it ‘would be sensible for each parent to record such an agreement in a note, email or text message sent to each other’.

Where parents disagree but one parent is concerned, then ‘that parent may exercise their parental responsibility and vary the arrangement to one that they consider to be safe. If, after the event, the actions of a parent acting on their own in this way are questioned by the other parent in the Family Court, the court is likely to look to see whether each parent acted reasonably and sensibly in the light of the official advice and the Stay at Home Rules in place at that time, together with any specific evidence relating to the child or family.’

However, Sir Andrew said the courts would expect the child to keep in touch with the non-resident parent through video connection such as FaceTime, WhatsApp, Skype or Zoom, or by telephone.

‘The key message should be that, where Coronavirus restrictions cause the letter of a court order to be varied, the spirit of the order should nevertheless be delivered by making safe alternative arrangements for the child,’ he said. Parental responsibility ‘rests with the child’s parents and not with the court’. 

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Chronic delays, duplication of work, cancelled hearings and inefficiencies in the family law courts are letting children and victims of domestic abuse down, a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) inquiry has found
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
back-to-top-scroll