header-logo header-logo

25 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Guidance for parents confused about access

Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, has issued guidance to resolve confusion on child arrangement orders during the COVID-19 pandemic

Parents whose children are subject to the orders have been unsure what to do, given that children moving between households could exacerbate the spread of the virus.

Government guidance issued alongside the Stay at Home rules that children under 18 ‘can be moved between their parents’ homes’, Sir Andrew said. However, this exception did not mean that children ‘must be moved between homes’.

Parents, acting in agreement, are free to vary an order during this time, and it ‘would be sensible for each parent to record such an agreement in a note, email or text message sent to each other’.

Where parents disagree but one parent is concerned, then ‘that parent may exercise their parental responsibility and vary the arrangement to one that they consider to be safe. If, after the event, the actions of a parent acting on their own in this way are questioned by the other parent in the Family Court, the court is likely to look to see whether each parent acted reasonably and sensibly in the light of the official advice and the Stay at Home Rules in place at that time, together with any specific evidence relating to the child or family.’

However, Sir Andrew said the courts would expect the child to keep in touch with the non-resident parent through video connection such as FaceTime, WhatsApp, Skype or Zoom, or by telephone.

‘The key message should be that, where Coronavirus restrictions cause the letter of a court order to be varied, the spirit of the order should nevertheless be delivered by making safe alternative arrangements for the child,’ he said. Parental responsibility ‘rests with the child’s parents and not with the court’. 

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Trio of recruits strengthens Switalskis residential property team

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Birmingham law firm appoints construction partner

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop accelerates Northern growth through strategic senior appointments

NEWS
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
back-to-top-scroll