header-logo header-logo

02 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Hardship payments for legal aid lawyers

The Law Society and Bar Council have given a mixed reaction to the government’s announcement of extra support for legal aid lawyers

The support includes expanding the scope and relaxing the evidence requirements for hardship payments in Crown court cases, including reducing the threshold for work done to £1,000, rather than the current £5,000.

Legal aid fees for First Tier Tribunal immigration and asylum appeals have been aligned with HM Courts and Tribunals Service’s move to an online system for these cases.

The Legal Aid Agency has also increased payments for virtual hearings in appeals before the Mental Health Tribunal, and for remote advice in police custody to ensure they are in line with in-person hearings. It has halted pursuit of outstanding debts owed to it, and is encouraging law firms to make the most of existing help, such as the ability to apply for early payment for work already done on a case.

Chair of the Bar, Amanda Pinto QC, said the measures would ‘have little impact on the many criminal legal aid barristers whose livelihood depends on conducting important criminal trials.

‘The changes, albeit made in a spirit of helpfulness, will have no effect on the overwhelming majority of criminal barristers.’

Law Society President Simon Davis said: ‘It still remains difficult to judge the scale of this crisis.

‘Whether this response is adequate will depend, among other things, on how quickly the police and courts are able to find new ways of handling more routine work―and thus maintaining a volume of cases throughout this period.

‘It will also depend to what extent, if and when some form of normality resumes, workload increases above their pre-crisis levels―enabling practitioners to recover lost income. This cannot be presumed. Even if so, it would require practitioners to incur significant additional costs long before they see such an increase.

‘Thus, there is significantly more that needs to be done to ensure the criminal defence sector is able to make it through this crisis.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll