header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Jury trials restart

10 May 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
Jury trials are to restart this month at certain courts including the Old Bailey and Cardiff Crown Court, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett has announced

Lord Burnett said he similarly continues to support the resumption of adjourned trials as soon as it is safe to do so.

The courts have been selected by the Jury Trials Working Group, chaired by Mr Justice Edis, which mooted plans last week for safe trials in courts of a suitable size and layout. Public Health England and Public Health Wales have been involved in the detailed arrangements.

Small numbers of trials are expected to take place initially. Meanwhile, more courts are being assessed around the country so that the number of cases heard can gradually increase.

Lord Burnett said: ‘It is important that the administration of justice continues to function whenever it is possible in an environment which is consistent with the safety of all those involved.’

Social distancing arrangements include providing a second courtroom, linked by closed circuit TV, to enable reporters and others to watch the proceedings, and another court room to use for jury deliberations. Courts staff will ensure entrances and exits are carefully supervised, and all necessary cleaning takes place.

The trials will be conducted under the same legal standards and procedures as before the COVID-19 emergency, with 12 jurors. 

New jury trials were suspended on 23 March due to the COVID-19 crisis.

However, some barristers expressed concern. Mark George QC, head of Garden Court North chambers, tweeted: ‘Jury trials to resume with 12 jurors whilst we have 5,000 new cases of the virus every day. This is at least month too soon. We are all part of a huge live experiment.’

Other lawyers queried how everyone would get to court and whether they were expected to take public transport.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘It is very encouraging to see that jury trials will start up again from mid-May.

‘Jury trials are essential to our criminal justice system and to the rule of law. It is reassuring that efforts to restart jury trials have involved a painstaking and cautious approach, that prioritises practical measures to ensure the safety of all those involved in the delivery of criminal justice.

‘The decision has not been made lightly. The Bar Council sees these first steps in managing and, then, we anticipate, as soon as is safely possible, rolling out jury trials more broadly across the nation, as a positive sign way that criminal justice matters.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll