header-logo header-logo

13 April 2020 / David Greene
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Justice matters

18925
Extraordinary time. Extraordinary human endeavour. Extraordinary consequences. David Greene reports

Coronavirus has caused huge suffering across the world. Governments have reacted in differing ways to deal with the crisis with the overriding purpose of ensuring the spread of it is kept to a minimum. Citizens have generally accepted with fortitude draconian statutory restrictions on their freedoms. We hope they will be short-lived. It will, indeed, be vital that when we return to a degree of normality these restrictions are repealed or fall under sunset clauses.

The restrictions have affected the profession as much as any sector. The Law Society and the Bar Council have been working hard with Government to meet the very new problems the profession faces. There are daily meetings with the Ministry of Justice and minsters. The Law Society is issuing daily bulletins to practitioners and has its advice and guidance updated daily on https://bit.ly/2xVd5Fw.

The immediate problems have been acute in, for instance, criminal justice. The workings of the criminal justice process from arrest to trial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll