header-logo header-logo

15 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Moratorium needed to protect the retail sector

Lawyers at City law firm RPC have called for a moratorium on petitions to wind up retail companies in order to contain COVID-19 disruption

According to the firm, 52 petitions to wind up retail companies have already been filed this year, as of 7 April, as struggling retailers fail to pay their creditors. The lawyers suggest giving retailers a buffer to help them stretch payment deadlines, while they attempt to mitigate the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

‘Even if the winding up petitions aren’t processed [due to the temporary closure of many courts], they scare off suppliers and possible funders and can have damaging effects on businesses,’ Finella Fogarty, business restructuring and insolvency partner, said.

‘Without supportive suppliers, retailers will struggle to weather the storm.’ She explained that the filing of a petition by one creditor can encourage other creditors to stop funding the business and can result in a freezing of its business accounts.

Few businesses have received finance through the government’s £330 billion loan scheme so far, she said, and there have been ‘significant delays’. Meanwhile, some banks have increased their interest rates on loans to as high as 35%.

Fogarty said: ‘Despite the much-needed government package, the challenge we’ve seen businesses face is that this money isn’t yet going out the door. Businesses are doing everything in their power to deal with their cash flow requirements until the money comes through.’

Karen Hendy, co-head of retail at RPC, said: ‘Whilst the government is taking action to help speed up the process of loans being granted, for many retail businesses the situation is highly time critical. The faster loans can be processed, the better.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll