header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Prisoners at risk, Lord Chancellor says

07 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Steps are being taken to prevent large-scale COVID-19 infections in our overcrowded prisons, but the numbers don’t add up, MPs have heard

Up to 4,000 low-risk prisoners could be released on licence, wearing electronic tags and under orders to stay at home, after the Easter weekend, the Lord Chancellor said, at an online evidence session of the House of Commons Justice Committee this week. Robert Buckland said this would balance fears of COVID-19 spreading in prisons with maintaining public confidence about freeing convicts early. He said the pandemic has created ‘an emergency’ in the country, and the tagging ‘gives the public the reassurance they are looking for’.

However, Dr Jo Farrar, Chief executive of the Prison Service, confirmed that the current 83,000 prisoner population would have to be reduced by between 10,000-15,000, for all prisoners to live in a single cell.

As of Monday evening, 6 April, 116 inmates in 43 prisons had tested positive for the coronavirus.

So far, six pregnant prisoners have been released, and there are plans to release up to 70 pregnant women and mothers with babies. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll