header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Protecting domestic abuse victims

07 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-detail
Domestic abuse victims are particularly vulnerable and will need more protection than ever during the COVID-19 lockdown, the Law Society has warned

Refuge has reported a 25% increase in calls from its average of 270 calls per day to its national domestic abuse helpline in the week commencing 30 March. Hits to the national domestic abuse website www.nationaldahelpline.org.uk increased by 150% during the initial stages of the lockdown. Refuge chief executive Sandra Horley said the window for women to seek help is extremely limited and, during periods of isolation with their perpetrator, this window narrows even further.

Law Society President Simon Davis said: ‘These figures are deeply concerning and are compounded by a lack of physical access to the courts.

‘The government guidance for emergency injunctions presumes victims can find a safe space away from their abuser, fill in an application, provide a valid witness statement and attend a telephone hearing. But social distancing has made it even more difficult for victims to get time away from their abuser to ask for help―leaving many trapped in an increasingly volatile situation.

‘The government’s guidance should provide alternatives for those who are locked in with their abuser and offer further support for those who have disabilities or face language issues when access to advice services and physical courts is limited. For those who do not qualify for legal aid and cannot afford a solicitor, navigating a telephone hearing unrepresented can prove even more complex than the usual court process.

‘Making non-means tested legal aid available for domestic abuse cases would give victims the legal support and access to justice they so desperately need.’

He urged the government to relax the domestic abuse gateway regulations so solicitors can certify an individual is a domestic abuse victim and allow them access to legal aid. Davis said many victims rely on evidence from a doctor, which is difficult to get at this time.

Meanwhile, HM Courts and Tribunals has issued guidance for members of the public applying for a domestic abuse injunction, at the invitation of Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division.

The guidance explains how a person who seeks protection must now apply to the court for an injunction by email or post, rather than in person.

Sir Andrew said the guidance was ‘timely’ as he was ‘concerned that there might be an enhanced need for the Family Court to provide protection from domestic abuse for children and adults during this period of family lockdown’.

The guidance can be found here: www.gov.uk/guidance/applying-for-a-domestic-violence-family-law-act-injunction-for-unrepresented-applicants.

Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll