header-logo header-logo

06 April 2020
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Human rights
printer mail-detail

COVID-19 restrictions legal challenge

Lawyers acting for two families with children with autism have mounted a legal challenge to the government’s COVID-19 restrictions on outdoor exercise

Bindmans issued a letter before action last week, regarding the requirement to leave the home only once a day and stay local. It argues that adults and children with disabilities, including autism and other mental health conditions, are disproportionately affected by the requirement, which is therefore unlawful and discriminatory.

The children may need to leave their home more than once a day, and go to a quiet location that is not local to their area.

Jamie Potter, partner at Bindmans, said: ‘The social distancing measures being put in place by government are clearly important, but they cannot be used to disproportionately interfere in the rights of those with protected characteristics, particularly those with mental illness, autism or similar conditions that necessitate leaving the house more than once per day.’

Bindmans said the government has since said it is ‘actively considering the issues raised’.

Issue: 7882 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll