header-logo header-logo

05 May 2020
Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: surviving the pandemic

Law centres and advice charities have been offered a £5.4m boost to help them cope with increased demand for social welfare advice during the COVID-19 pandemic

The funding, announced by the Ministry of Justice this week, will be administered by the Access to Justice Foundation and the Law Centres Network (LCN).

LCN Chair Helen Rogers said: ‘The pandemic’s uneven impact is a grim reminder of the deep inequality in our society that affects every aspect of life.

‘This support recognises the key role of legal assistance in reducing inequality and bringing justice for all.’

Meanwhile, sections of the Bar and the solicitors’ profession have expressed concern about their ability to survive the pandemic.

In a Law Society survey of small firms (four or fewer partners, including sole practitioners) last week, 71% said they may have to close their business in the next six months as a result of the crisis. The respondents reported cashflow pressures and reduced fee income due to reduced court hearings and property transactions, and declining business activity overall.

Law Society President Simon Davis said many businesses will fall through the cracks of government relief, for example, there is no support for solicitors who are paid via dividends or who are self-employed but earned more than £50,000 profit in the preceding year.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar, welcomed the extra funding for charities and law centres but said: ‘Propping up law centres is only a small part of what is necessary to protect the public: if it is not accompanied by practical support for barristers and solicitors, many of whom are struggling to stay afloat, access to justice will sink with them.’

A Bar Council survey in April found 53% of self-employed barristers will not survive six months under current conditions without financial aid of some sort, and 74% won’t survive a year. The criminal bar was hardest hit―31% said they would not last three months without financial aid, 69% would not last six months and 88% would not last a year.

Pinto has called on the Treasury to expand its rescue package so more self-employed barristers are eligible.

Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll