header-logo header-logo

05 May 2020
Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: surviving the pandemic

Law centres and advice charities have been offered a £5.4m boost to help them cope with increased demand for social welfare advice during the COVID-19 pandemic

The funding, announced by the Ministry of Justice this week, will be administered by the Access to Justice Foundation and the Law Centres Network (LCN).

LCN Chair Helen Rogers said: ‘The pandemic’s uneven impact is a grim reminder of the deep inequality in our society that affects every aspect of life.

‘This support recognises the key role of legal assistance in reducing inequality and bringing justice for all.’

Meanwhile, sections of the Bar and the solicitors’ profession have expressed concern about their ability to survive the pandemic.

In a Law Society survey of small firms (four or fewer partners, including sole practitioners) last week, 71% said they may have to close their business in the next six months as a result of the crisis. The respondents reported cashflow pressures and reduced fee income due to reduced court hearings and property transactions, and declining business activity overall.

Law Society President Simon Davis said many businesses will fall through the cracks of government relief, for example, there is no support for solicitors who are paid via dividends or who are self-employed but earned more than £50,000 profit in the preceding year.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar, welcomed the extra funding for charities and law centres but said: ‘Propping up law centres is only a small part of what is necessary to protect the public: if it is not accompanied by practical support for barristers and solicitors, many of whom are struggling to stay afloat, access to justice will sink with them.’

A Bar Council survey in April found 53% of self-employed barristers will not survive six months under current conditions without financial aid of some sort, and 74% won’t survive a year. The criminal bar was hardest hit―31% said they would not last three months without financial aid, 69% would not last six months and 88% would not last a year.

Pinto has called on the Treasury to expand its rescue package so more self-employed barristers are eligible.

Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Banking and finance practice bolstered by partner hire

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

Commercial litigation team welcomes senior associate in Birmingham

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll