header-logo header-logo

COVID-19 & virtual mediation

16 April 2020 / Suzanne Rab
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Profession , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Managing the virtual mediation process: what next for ADR after COVID-19, asks Professor Suzanne Rab

  • Coronavirus: response of the legal profession.
  • Virtual mediation: a dispute resolution solution that does not revolve around physical meetings.

The outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic continues to affect the legal profession alongside other major industries in unprecedented ways. Lockdowns and social distancing measures have enforced court closures and, with more limited virtual alternatives, this situation will increase delays in dealing with backlogs. In order to deal with this novel situation, the profession’s response is largely going to focus on leveraging tech-based solutions to keep the wheels of justice moving. Already, courts are using video conferencing technology to conduct hearings. While significant flexibility has been shown by both judges and litigants in participating in video-hearings, more radical shifts are required to manage the impact on both existing and pipeline cases. Furthermore, supply-chain issues, employment disputes and other commercial matters emerging from the pandemic itself will further burden the justice system in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll