header-logo header-logo

CPS could do better on domestic abuse

24 January 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and police handling of evidence-led domestic abuse prosecutions require improvement, inspectors have warned

An evidence-led prosecution takes place without the victim’s support. A joint inspection to see whether CPS lawyers and police understand what’s needed to build viable evidence-led prosecutions was carried out by HM CPS Inspectorate and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS).

The inspectors found that all levels in the police and CPS recognised that domestic abuse is a priority area and had a desire to achieve the best possible outcomes. However, they recommended that officers and prosecutors ensure that, from the outset of a case, they consider how to prosecute if the victim withdraws their support.  That would lead to a more detailed investigation at the scene, such as evidence from neighbours, forensic and photographic evidence.

Another recommendation was that evidence-led cases be given the same weight and training as is offered on dealing with general domestic abuse.

Inspectors examined 78 domestic abuse cases where the police had decided to take no action because the victim did not support prosecution. In 15 of those cases, they found investigators had missed the opportunity to explore reasonable lines of enquiry.

Prosecutors were found to be making sound legal decisions in domestic abuse cases, generally, but in 42.1% of appropriate cases, there was no consideration of how to progress the case without victim participation when the CPS prosecutor authorised charge.

At the later legal review stage there was no proper consideration in 40.1% of appropriate cases.   

Inspector Wendy Williams and Chief Inspector Kevin McGinty said: ‘Both the police service and CPS are moving in the right direction but much more can be done to ensure an evidence led approach is considered a focus and priority, and it should be considered for all cases at an early stage.

‘Officers should prioritise effective evidence gathering, and prosecutors should highlight it, by working on the assumption that the victim may withdraw support, in order for the prospects of success to improve.’ 

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll