header-logo header-logo

24 January 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

CPS could do better on domestic abuse

Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and police handling of evidence-led domestic abuse prosecutions require improvement, inspectors have warned

An evidence-led prosecution takes place without the victim’s support. A joint inspection to see whether CPS lawyers and police understand what’s needed to build viable evidence-led prosecutions was carried out by HM CPS Inspectorate and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS).

The inspectors found that all levels in the police and CPS recognised that domestic abuse is a priority area and had a desire to achieve the best possible outcomes. However, they recommended that officers and prosecutors ensure that, from the outset of a case, they consider how to prosecute if the victim withdraws their support.  That would lead to a more detailed investigation at the scene, such as evidence from neighbours, forensic and photographic evidence.

Another recommendation was that evidence-led cases be given the same weight and training as is offered on dealing with general domestic abuse.

Inspectors examined 78 domestic abuse cases where the police had decided to take no action because the victim did not support prosecution. In 15 of those cases, they found investigators had missed the opportunity to explore reasonable lines of enquiry.

Prosecutors were found to be making sound legal decisions in domestic abuse cases, generally, but in 42.1% of appropriate cases, there was no consideration of how to progress the case without victim participation when the CPS prosecutor authorised charge.

At the later legal review stage there was no proper consideration in 40.1% of appropriate cases.   

Inspector Wendy Williams and Chief Inspector Kevin McGinty said: ‘Both the police service and CPS are moving in the right direction but much more can be done to ensure an evidence led approach is considered a focus and priority, and it should be considered for all cases at an early stage.

‘Officers should prioritise effective evidence gathering, and prosecutors should highlight it, by working on the assumption that the victim may withdraw support, in order for the prospects of success to improve.’ 

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll