header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Cracking the code

Are spats with mobile phone giants inevitable? Malcolm Dowden reports

The Electronic Communications Code is often presented as a problem for property owners (and property lawyers) and a trump card for code operators. In fact, code powers exist not to benefit a particular operator, but to protect public access to electronic communications networks and services (see box on p 1403). The spread of municipal broadband, wi-fi communities such as BT Fon and the emergence of gap-filling technologies such as Wi-Max and femtocells mean that it is increasingly difficult for code operators to show that the loss of a particular site will produce a gap in coverage, even where network sharing agreements are in place, as between Vodafone and Orange, T-Mobile and H3G. In this context, a counter-notice is likely to be served in the hope that it will be a deterrent, either making the landowner drop his demands or at least buying time for negotiation. Code operators do not welcome the cost and risks of going to court.

 

 

Once installed, a code operator's apparatus

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll