header-logo header-logo

22 October 2015 / Sue Nash
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Cracking the code

nlj_7673_nash

Where are we now with J-codes, asks Sue Nash

“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a [judge] in possession of a good [imagination], must be in want of a [solution]”.

Lord Justice Jackson’s solution to controlling what was seen as the excessive costs of litigation included a call to “harmonise the procedures and systems which we use for costs budgeting, costs management, summary assessment and detailed assessment”.

Following the publication of Jackson LJ’s final report, the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) set up a working party to look into how this might be achieved. Its report in October 2011 recommended that, in the first instance, an England/Wales version of the uniform task-based management system (UTBMS) codes be created as a pre-cursor to any bill of costs being devised.

The committee was then “taken over” by Jeremy Morgan QC and thereafter, comprised a mixture of costs lawyers, solicitors, in-house counsel, e-billing experts and legal software suppliers. Following two years of hard work by this committee

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll