header-logo header-logo

13 April 2017 / Andrew Langdon KC
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Cracks in the system?

nlj_7742_langdon

How can we ensure criminal justice co-operation with the EU post-Brexit, asks Andrew Langdon QC

Recently I gave evidence before the Home Affairs Sub-Committee of the House of Lords EU Committee which has been considering criminal justice co-operation with the EU after Brexit. The session focused on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). We were engaged in answering anxious questions from their Lordships about how the UK might preserve a system of extradition within the EU that seemed to be working so well between member states.

Compared to a relative trickle a decade ago, we currently surrender over one thousand subjects a year to other member states of the EU. They in turn surrender about one hundred and fifty a year to us. The process is short. It does not, as used to be the case, involve a long-winded and unpredictable interaction between diplomats and governments, but has become a streamlined judicial process involving mutual recognition of the jurisdictions and rights of all citizens of Europe.

In the balance

All that, of course,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll