header-logo header-logo

13 April 2017 / Andrew Langdon KC
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Cracks in the system?

nlj_7742_langdon

How can we ensure criminal justice co-operation with the EU post-Brexit, asks Andrew Langdon QC

Recently I gave evidence before the Home Affairs Sub-Committee of the House of Lords EU Committee which has been considering criminal justice co-operation with the EU after Brexit. The session focused on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). We were engaged in answering anxious questions from their Lordships about how the UK might preserve a system of extradition within the EU that seemed to be working so well between member states.

Compared to a relative trickle a decade ago, we currently surrender over one thousand subjects a year to other member states of the EU. They in turn surrender about one hundred and fifty a year to us. The process is short. It does not, as used to be the case, involve a long-winded and unpredictable interaction between diplomats and governments, but has become a streamlined judicial process involving mutual recognition of the jurisdictions and rights of all citizens of Europe.

In the balance

All that, of course,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll