header-logo header-logo

The creditors’ claims (4)

11 July 2014 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
commercial_insolvency_duncan

Simon Duncan concludes his series of articles on the right to sue former directors

Section 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and s 15 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) are derived from the same source and aimed at the same mischief. That is to say, these sections make delinquent directors co-debtors with the company for the company’s debts. In doing this, these sections strengthen creditors’ rights of redress. They allow creditors to act when the evidence suggests that a “phoenix” company has resumed the failed company’s business improperly, or when creditors have lost money in the liquidation of a company run by a disqualified director.

Re Prestige Grindings Ltd

Although the Acts themselves are silent as to who may bring a claim pursuant to these sections, the case law makes it clear that it is the creditors that have the requisite standing (see “The creditors’ claims” 162 NLJ 7530, p 1175 and Re Prestige Grindings Ltd [2006] BCC 421; [2005] EWHC 3076).

Prestige Grinding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll