header-logo header-logo

The creditors’ claims (4)

11 July 2014 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
commercial_insolvency_duncan

Simon Duncan concludes his series of articles on the right to sue former directors

Section 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and s 15 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) are derived from the same source and aimed at the same mischief. That is to say, these sections make delinquent directors co-debtors with the company for the company’s debts. In doing this, these sections strengthen creditors’ rights of redress. They allow creditors to act when the evidence suggests that a “phoenix” company has resumed the failed company’s business improperly, or when creditors have lost money in the liquidation of a company run by a disqualified director.

Re Prestige Grindings Ltd

Although the Acts themselves are silent as to who may bring a claim pursuant to these sections, the case law makes it clear that it is the creditors that have the requisite standing (see “The creditors’ claims” 162 NLJ 7530, p 1175 and Re Prestige Grindings Ltd [2006] BCC 421; [2005] EWHC 3076).

Prestige Grinding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll