header-logo header-logo

11 July 2014 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The creditors’ claims (4)

commercial_insolvency_duncan

Simon Duncan concludes his series of articles on the right to sue former directors

Section 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and s 15 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) are derived from the same source and aimed at the same mischief. That is to say, these sections make delinquent directors co-debtors with the company for the company’s debts. In doing this, these sections strengthen creditors’ rights of redress. They allow creditors to act when the evidence suggests that a “phoenix” company has resumed the failed company’s business improperly, or when creditors have lost money in the liquidation of a company run by a disqualified director.

Re Prestige Grindings Ltd

Although the Acts themselves are silent as to who may bring a claim pursuant to these sections, the case law makes it clear that it is the creditors that have the requisite standing (see “The creditors’ claims” 162 NLJ 7530, p 1175 and Re Prestige Grindings Ltd [2006] BCC 421; [2005] EWHC 3076).

Prestige Grinding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll