header-logo header-logo

16 December 2022 / David Walbank KC
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Crime brief: 16 December 2022

104929
David Walbank KC examines what a ‘foreign criminal’ can be expected to do to escape homophobic violence following deportation
  • Persecution of the LGBQT community in foreign states.
  • Deportation of ‘foreign criminals’. 
  • Relevance of criminal convictions in the UK.

The World Cup in Qatar has put the whole issue of LGBQT rights under the spotlight and has forcefully reminded us that the liberal approach of the Western democracies is by no means mirrored across the globe, even in those states that wish to gain acceptance among the family of nations. The treatment of those who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender or non-binary arises with increasing frequency in the criminal courts, not least when it comes to the rights of individuals whom the government wishes to deport to their countries of origin. It recently came before the Supreme Court in SC (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 15, [2022] All ER (D) 38 (Jun).

Fleeing Jamaica

SC was born in Jamaica

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll