header-logo header-logo

07 August 2008 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Crime brief

Proceeds of crime

R (on the application of the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police) v City of Salford Magistrates’ Court R (on the application of Sarwar and Sons (Knitwear) Ltd) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2008] All ER (D) 272 (Jul), [2008] EWHC 1651 (Admin)

In considering s 295 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (which deals with detention of cash following seizure) at an interim stage of a police investigation, the test for the court to consider was whether or not criminal monies had been a material contribution to the acquisition of restrained monies. It was in essence a lower threshold than that required under s 298.

The district judge was therefore not asking himself the right question—which was whether there were reasonable grounds for suspecting that this money derived to a material degree from the labour of people whom it was a criminal offence to employ, and whether its further detention was justified pending investigation of its derivation, or consideration was given to bringing proceedings against any person “for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll