header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 158, Issue 7333

07 August 2008
IN THIS ISSUE

Leofelis SA and another v Lonsdale Sports Ltd and others [2008] EWCA Civ 640, [2008] All ER (D) 87 (Jul)

West London Pipeline and Storage Ltd v Total UK Ltd [2008] EWHC 1729 (Comm), [2008] All ER (D) 294

Bailey (by her father and litigation friend) v Ministry of Defence and another [2008] EWCA Civ 883, [2008] All ER (D) 382 (Jul)

CTI Group Inc v Transclear SA [2008] EWCA Civ 856, [2008] All ER (D) 290 (Jul)

Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel [2008] EWHC 1688, [2008] All ER (D) 274 (Jul)

Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008, which came into force on 21 July 2008, enables the making of “witness anonymity orders.

Haringey London Borough Council v MA [2008] EWHC 1722 (Fam)

Coleman v Attridge Law (Case C- 303/06), [2008] All ER (D) 245 (Jul)

Proceeds of crime

Niran de Silva reflects on Dwain Chambers' failure to overturn a byelaw making him ineligible for the Beijing Olympics

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll