header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 August 2008 / Niran De Silva
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Public , Employment
printer mail-detail

Too slow off the blocks?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Niran de Silva reflects on Dwain Chambers' failure to overturn a byelaw making him ineligible for the Beijing Olympics

The recent application by the sprinter Dwain Chambers for an interim injunction, which would effectively have required the British Olympic Association (BOA) to select him for the Beijing Olympics, raises a number of issues relating to the enforcement of anti-doping rules in sport.

The background to the application was that the BOA's byelaw 25 prevented Chambers from being selected for Team GB at any Olympics as he had previously been found guilty of a doping offence. This rule applied even though the original two-year ban for the offence imposed by UK Athletics had expired.

Chambers argued that byelaw 25 was in restraint of trade, irrational or perverse so as to engage the court's supervisory jurisdiction, and also contrary to European and domestic competition law. However, the judge found that he had failed to prove there was a reviewable restraint of trade or that the byelaw was disproportionate. He also found that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll