header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Crime brief: 4 November 2022

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
04 November 2022 / David Walbank KC
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail
99720
Equality before the law: David Walbank KC examines a case which tested the limits of this most fundamental legal doctrine
  • Equality before the law.
  • Ex-monarch sued for harassment. 
  • Doctrine of state immunity. 

From day one of their legal studies, it is drummed into students that ‘all are equal before the law’. But does that actually mean anything? In the next two ‘Crime brief’ pieces, we will look at two very different cases, each of which demonstrates that it is very much more than a highfalutin phrase.

Harassment allegations

Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn v De Borbon y Borbon [2022] EWHC 668 (QB) concerned a civil action in harassment brought by the estranged lover of an ex-king and prompted consideration of the doctrine of state immunity.

Corinna zu-Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn (pictured) is a German-born Danish entrepreneur with homes in Monaco, Switzerland, London and Shropshire. In the mid-2000s, she became the mistress of Juan Carlos I, the King of Spain, but five years later, their relationship ended in acrimony. When, after four

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll