header-logo header-logo

26 July 2007
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Crime rates remain steady as new strategy launched

News

Young people are being targeted in a new crime strategy, unveiled this week by home secretary Jacqui Smith.

The news comes as the latest figures from the British Crime Survey (BCS) show that overall crime rates remained at the same level in England and Wales over the past year.

The risk of being a victim of crime increased by 1% however, while reported incidents of vandalism shot up by 10%. Remaining unchanged were domestic burglary rates and vehicle thefts.
Violence against people fell by 1%—the first fall in that category in eight years—and the number of police recorded crimes involving firearms dropped by 13%.

Focusing on early intervention, including forging closer links between schools and the police, the strategy, Cutting Crime: A New Partnership 2008–11, also includes plans for UK citizens to be able to look at police crime data in their area on the internet from July next year.

Graham Robb, interim chair of the Youth Justice Board (YSB), says: “The YSB supports the aims and objectives of the strategy and is particularly keen to see such a strong focus on prevention and restorative work.
“There is now an established framework for delivering effective prevention programmes across the youth justice system and we welcome this renewed focus, which it is hoped will support continuing success.

“The Youth Justice Board has worked hard to encourage collaboration between communities and partners, which it recognises is central to tackling youth crime—another area given fresh emphasis in the crime strategy.”
Richard Garside, director of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies at King’s College London, points out that the more the government has spent on criminal justice and the deeper their reforms have gone, the smaller has been the fall in the official crime rate.

He says: “This raises serious questions about the prudence of the record criminal justice expenditure of recent years. It also brings into question the reliance the government has placed in finding criminal justice solutions to what are far more complex, deep-rooted social problems.”

Issue: 7283 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll