header-logo header-logo

10 February 2023 / George Hepburne Scott , Giovanna Fiorentino
Issue: 8012 / Categories: Features , Extradition , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal activity: neither here nor there

110183
George Hepburne Scott & Giovanna Fiorentino examine extradition where the relevant alleged criminal activity took place outside of the requesting state
  • The scope of the offence of ‘criminal participation’ under the Serious Crime Act 2015 has been redrawn by the High Court.
  • The court held that there can be no criminal liability under s 45 of the Act for purely extra-territorial activity.
  • UN ‘Palermo’ Convention considered.

On 2 December 2022, Mr Justice Fordham delivered his judgment in the case of Fedorowicz v Prosecutor General’s Office (Lithuania) [2022] EWHC 3088 (Admin).

The appellant in the case was appealing an extradition order made at Westminster Magistrates’ Court by a district judge on 17 August 2021. Permission to appeal had been granted by Thornton J on 24 March 2022.

Dual criminality

At first instance, inter alia, the respondent judicial authority—which made the extradition request through an international extradition arrest warrant issued pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Trade and Co-Operation Agreement signed between

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll