header-logo header-logo

Criminal Bar strike: update

02 September 2022
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Criminal barristers will down tools indefinitely from next week, in a major escalation of their strike action which has been taking place on alternate weeks

The protest, which has led to an unusual picket line of wigs and gowns, has been ongoing since April, led by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA). The barristers began by operating a ‘no returns’ policy, moving to incrementally increasing strike action in June. They are calling for a 25% increase in legal aid fees for defence work, and demand the government ‘at least’ implement with immediate effect the minimum 15% increase recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review (CLAR).

However, the Ministry of Justice has so far promised only a 15% increase in October, which the CBA says would not reach barristers’ pockets until late 2023.

Criminal law solicitors will receive an extra 9% in fees from September.

Last week, nearly 80% of 2,273 CBA members voted to escalate the protest.

Mark Fenhalls QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘Members of the criminal Bar have been feeling mistreated, undervalued and overwhelmed for a decade or more.

‘Ministers must look again immediately at ways to fund the backlog cases and bring a resolution to this difficult situation.’

CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said this week the next government should understand ‘we will not be deflected from achieving an outcome that safeguards the future sustainability of our criminal justice system.

‘Faithful to our members, that outcome must include an increase to our fees of 25%, payment for written work, a clear timetable for the implementation of the CLAR recommendations on wasted and special preparation, a second brief fee for section 28 cases, and a pay review body that protects us from the ravages of inflation,’ he said.’

Sidhu will hand over the CBA reins to current vice chair Kirsty Brimelow QC in September. Read Sidhu's final message here.
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll