header-logo header-logo

02 December 2020
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Criminal Bar ‘will take action’

Plans for extended operating hours may provoke strike action

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has hinted at potential strike action if the government presses ahead with extended operating hours.

An HM Courts & Tribunal Service (HMCTS) ‘Consultation with legal professionals on COVID operating hours in the Crown Courts’ ends on 10 December. Extended operating hours (with courts sitting 9am-1pm and 2pm-6pm) is currently being piloted in seven Crown Courts.

Extended operating hours were discussed last week at a meeting between the CBA, other legal professionals and HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS). CBA chair James Mulholland QC, in his message to members this week, said ‘we were, effectively, not being asked but being told that there were plans for Extended Operating Hours Courts to go ahead from January 2021’.

After setting out the CBA’s objections to the plan, Mulholland said: ‘In 2015 we took action, refusing returns, in solidarity with criminal legal aid solicitors…Cuts to criminal advocates’ legal aid fees and a failure to increase prosecution fees resulted in the Criminal Bar balloting for and taking action in 2018 and 2019…If HMCTS maintain their position that these courts will be introduced, we will take action.’

He said HMCTS has failed to conduct a proper assessment of the plan, in breach of the Equality Act 2010, adding: ‘The consultation process now initiated provides insufficient time for proper representations to be made.’

Mulholland warned extended operating hours would deter people from the criminal Bar, particularly women, citing a CBA survey three years ago showing it would have a ‘very significant discriminatory impact on those with young children and other caring responsibilities’. He said the Spending Review commitment of £275m last week should be used to expand the physical court space available.

The backlog of cases in Crown Courts has increased to 50,000 from about 40,000 in March, and will take years to clear, according to evidence given by the Lord Chief Justice to the Justice Committee. He predicted increasing numbers of cases coming through the courts, and said ‘even if we were able to run those courts flat out, we would be retrieving the backlog only a little, maybe by 50 cases a week or that sort’. 

Issue: 7913 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll