header-logo header-logo

02 December 2020
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Criminal Bar ‘will take action’

Plans for extended operating hours may provoke strike action

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has hinted at potential strike action if the government presses ahead with extended operating hours.

An HM Courts & Tribunal Service (HMCTS) ‘Consultation with legal professionals on COVID operating hours in the Crown Courts’ ends on 10 December. Extended operating hours (with courts sitting 9am-1pm and 2pm-6pm) is currently being piloted in seven Crown Courts.

Extended operating hours were discussed last week at a meeting between the CBA, other legal professionals and HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS). CBA chair James Mulholland QC, in his message to members this week, said ‘we were, effectively, not being asked but being told that there were plans for Extended Operating Hours Courts to go ahead from January 2021’.

After setting out the CBA’s objections to the plan, Mulholland said: ‘In 2015 we took action, refusing returns, in solidarity with criminal legal aid solicitors…Cuts to criminal advocates’ legal aid fees and a failure to increase prosecution fees resulted in the Criminal Bar balloting for and taking action in 2018 and 2019…If HMCTS maintain their position that these courts will be introduced, we will take action.’

He said HMCTS has failed to conduct a proper assessment of the plan, in breach of the Equality Act 2010, adding: ‘The consultation process now initiated provides insufficient time for proper representations to be made.’

Mulholland warned extended operating hours would deter people from the criminal Bar, particularly women, citing a CBA survey three years ago showing it would have a ‘very significant discriminatory impact on those with young children and other caring responsibilities’. He said the Spending Review commitment of £275m last week should be used to expand the physical court space available.

The backlog of cases in Crown Courts has increased to 50,000 from about 40,000 in March, and will take years to clear, according to evidence given by the Lord Chief Justice to the Justice Committee. He predicted increasing numbers of cases coming through the courts, and said ‘even if we were able to run those courts flat out, we would be retrieving the backlog only a little, maybe by 50 cases a week or that sort’. 

Issue: 7913 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll