header-logo header-logo

Criminal BVT proposals shelved

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Legal news update

Plans to introduce best value tendering (BVT) for criminal defence services in October have been scrapped by the Legal Services Commission (LSC) following fierce opposition from stakeholders.

The LSC says it will sit down with service providers and representative bodies to revamp its BVT plans before it puts a new model out to consultation at the end of this year. The new-look scheme will also be piloted in a few selected areas before it is rolled out countrywide, the LSC confirms.

Carolyn Regan, LSC chief executive, says: “The LSC shares with its service providers the desire of greater certainty and greater stability. We have listened to them and have made a number of changes to our initial plans for BVT as a result. We are putting back the second consultation on BVT to December 2008 so that we have more time to work with providers and their representative bodies.

“Following the second consultation if BVT is adopted it will be piloted and then evaluated before deciding whether or not to go forward with it in other areas of England and Wales. The start date for tendering for any pilot has also been put back to July 2009 at the earliest.”

She adds: “The LSC believes that BVT has the potential to secure high quality criminal legal aid services, best value for taxpayers money and a fair deal for providers.”

The original BVT proposals were shelved after the initial consultation showed overwhelming opposition to the scheme with all the representative bodies who responded being against the initiative.

Law Society legal aid manager, Richard Miller, says: “Given the strength of opposition from legal aid practitioners, we are pleased that the LSC has acknowledged many of the problems posed by BVT and will now give careful consideration to the issues before any further steps to implement it are taken.”

He welcomes the LSC’s decision to pilot the scheme and carry out an evaluation before any national roll-out takes place.

Miller adds: “We hope the evaluation process will be objective and transparent, and that BVT will not proceed nationally if our concerns about it threatening the sustainability of legally aided criminal defence services are borne out.

“The LSC has accepted the need to work a more realistic timetable; the pilot means that should BVT ultimately be given the green light, legal aid providers will now have much more time to prepare for the tendering process.”

The LSC has also set out other developments it intends to make in criminal legal aid over the next year. These include consulting on introducing means testing in the Crown Court and consultation on Crown Court remuneration.

 

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll