header-logo header-logo

Criminal BVT proposals shelved

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Legal news update

Plans to introduce best value tendering (BVT) for criminal defence services in October have been scrapped by the Legal Services Commission (LSC) following fierce opposition from stakeholders.

The LSC says it will sit down with service providers and representative bodies to revamp its BVT plans before it puts a new model out to consultation at the end of this year. The new-look scheme will also be piloted in a few selected areas before it is rolled out countrywide, the LSC confirms.

Carolyn Regan, LSC chief executive, says: “The LSC shares with its service providers the desire of greater certainty and greater stability. We have listened to them and have made a number of changes to our initial plans for BVT as a result. We are putting back the second consultation on BVT to December 2008 so that we have more time to work with providers and their representative bodies.

“Following the second consultation if BVT is adopted it will be piloted and then evaluated before deciding whether or not to go forward with it in other areas of England and Wales. The start date for tendering for any pilot has also been put back to July 2009 at the earliest.”

She adds: “The LSC believes that BVT has the potential to secure high quality criminal legal aid services, best value for taxpayers money and a fair deal for providers.”

The original BVT proposals were shelved after the initial consultation showed overwhelming opposition to the scheme with all the representative bodies who responded being against the initiative.

Law Society legal aid manager, Richard Miller, says: “Given the strength of opposition from legal aid practitioners, we are pleased that the LSC has acknowledged many of the problems posed by BVT and will now give careful consideration to the issues before any further steps to implement it are taken.”

He welcomes the LSC’s decision to pilot the scheme and carry out an evaluation before any national roll-out takes place.

Miller adds: “We hope the evaluation process will be objective and transparent, and that BVT will not proceed nationally if our concerns about it threatening the sustainability of legally aided criminal defence services are borne out.

“The LSC has accepted the need to work a more realistic timetable; the pilot means that should BVT ultimately be given the green light, legal aid providers will now have much more time to prepare for the tendering process.”

The LSC has also set out other developments it intends to make in criminal legal aid over the next year. These include consulting on introducing means testing in the Crown Court and consultation on Crown Court remuneration.

 

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll