header-logo header-logo

19 July 2023
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Criminal court backlog grows again

The criminal court backlog has grown and the number of part-time judges has fallen. 

HM Courts & Tribunals Service data for May, published last week, reveal 63,238 cases outstanding in the crown courts, up from 62,062 in April. The Ministry of Justice target is 53,000 cases by March 2025.

The magistrates’ court backlog was 344,154, up from 343,206 in April. Diversity of the judiciary statistics, also released last week, showed the number of recorders has fallen to 955 this year, from 1,047 in 2022.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘It is alarming that the huge backlogs of criminal court cases continue to grow rather than shrink.’ 

Issue: 8034 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll