header-logo header-logo

Criminal gains

19 October 2012 / Christopher Cant
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
istock_000009413571medium_4

Can a criminal squatter acquire title by adverse possession? Christopher Cant investigates

Criminal entry onto land will not block a claim to title based on adverse possession. Will the new offence aimed at residential squatters prevent such a squatter succeeding with an adverse possession claim?

Section 144 of the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 makes it an offence to squat in a residential building from 1 September 2012. Previously s 7 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 (CLA 1977) made it an offence for a trespasser not to leave having been asked to do so by a “displaced residential owner” or a “protected intending occupier”. The new offence applies to all residential buildings whether or not vacant immediately prior to the trespass and whether or not a request to leave has been made.

The elements of the offence set out in sub-section (1) are:

  1. the person is in a residential building as a trespasser having entered it as a trespasser;
  2. the person knows or ought to know that he or she
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll