header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Christopher Cant
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Criminal gains

istock_000009413571medium_4

Can a criminal squatter acquire title by adverse possession? Christopher Cant investigates

Criminal entry onto land will not block a claim to title based on adverse possession. Will the new offence aimed at residential squatters prevent such a squatter succeeding with an adverse possession claim?

Section 144 of the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 makes it an offence to squat in a residential building from 1 September 2012. Previously s 7 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 (CLA 1977) made it an offence for a trespasser not to leave having been asked to do so by a “displaced residential owner” or a “protected intending occupier”. The new offence applies to all residential buildings whether or not vacant immediately prior to the trespass and whether or not a request to leave has been made.

The elements of the offence set out in sub-section (1) are:

  1. the person is in a residential building as a trespasser having entered it as a trespasser;
  2. the person knows or ought to know that he or she
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll