header-logo header-logo

13 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers at risk

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has questioned why the courts are to spend time piloting COVID-19 testing at selected sites when such a scheme has already ‘been administered in car parks up and down the land for many months’

James Mulholland QC, in his Monday Message to members this week, said the CBA raised the issue of testing with HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) before Christmas but have ‘just been informed that the Service is developing a limited pilot scheme in relation to lateral flow testing for all court users…We need testing brought in immediately. Testing kits should be on their way to all court centres now.’

He said there were problems with HMCTS’s attempts to track and trace court users, since not all barristers who tested positive for the virus had been contacted, and nor was HMCTS locating all those who had been in contact with those who had positive tests.

The CBA met with unions and representative bodies of professional court users last week to discuss ‘serious concerns’ about safety. Mulholland said: ‘A mass testing system needs an immediate, court-wide roll-out. We need a faster Covid vaccination programme for professional court users.’

He warned the new variant of the virus increased the risk of visits to poorly ventilated cell areas and trials where judges fail to take regular breaks. Various accounts, particularly from magistrates’ courts indicated the desire to push on with hearings was taking precedence over safety, he said, while ‘in the last few days alone, we are seeing professional court users continuing to test positive for the virus from Cardiff to Sheffield to Norwich’.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: ‘We continue to work with DHSC (Department for Health and Social Care) to understand whether rapid testing could be delivered in a court setting.’

 

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll