header-logo header-logo

13 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers at risk

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has questioned why the courts are to spend time piloting COVID-19 testing at selected sites when such a scheme has already ‘been administered in car parks up and down the land for many months’

James Mulholland QC, in his Monday Message to members this week, said the CBA raised the issue of testing with HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) before Christmas but have ‘just been informed that the Service is developing a limited pilot scheme in relation to lateral flow testing for all court users…We need testing brought in immediately. Testing kits should be on their way to all court centres now.’

He said there were problems with HMCTS’s attempts to track and trace court users, since not all barristers who tested positive for the virus had been contacted, and nor was HMCTS locating all those who had been in contact with those who had positive tests.

The CBA met with unions and representative bodies of professional court users last week to discuss ‘serious concerns’ about safety. Mulholland said: ‘A mass testing system needs an immediate, court-wide roll-out. We need a faster Covid vaccination programme for professional court users.’

He warned the new variant of the virus increased the risk of visits to poorly ventilated cell areas and trials where judges fail to take regular breaks. Various accounts, particularly from magistrates’ courts indicated the desire to push on with hearings was taking precedence over safety, he said, while ‘in the last few days alone, we are seeing professional court users continuing to test positive for the virus from Cardiff to Sheffield to Norwich’.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: ‘We continue to work with DHSC (Department for Health and Social Care) to understand whether rapid testing could be delivered in a court setting.’

 

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll