header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers vent anger at pay cuts

News

Criminal courts across England and Wales are due to be thrown into chaos this week by a two-day strike by legal aid lawyers protesting at plans to change pay structures.

The grass roots action has been arranged by lawyers furious at the potential impact of the Carter proposals, which will introduce competitive tendering, as well as a range of issues surrounding their pay.
The Law Society is currently taking advice on whether it can bring a judicial review against the government’s proposals.

According to the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association (CLSA), the new payment scheme represents a 10% pay cut overall. It points out that rates of pay have been frozen for 12 years, while costs have risen by 50% over the same period.

The CLSA is supporting the action, although it played no role in organising it.
Prominent criminal lawyer Rodney Warren says: “There’s just huge anger. This is about competitive tendering, the closure of law firms, not having fees raised, not being paid for travelling and waiting. People have had enough and the Legal Services Commission seems to be closing its ears.”

Issue: 7260 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll