header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers vent anger at pay cuts

News

Criminal courts across England and Wales are due to be thrown into chaos this week by a two-day strike by legal aid lawyers protesting at plans to change pay structures.

The grass roots action has been arranged by lawyers furious at the potential impact of the Carter proposals, which will introduce competitive tendering, as well as a range of issues surrounding their pay.
The Law Society is currently taking advice on whether it can bring a judicial review against the government’s proposals.

According to the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association (CLSA), the new payment scheme represents a 10% pay cut overall. It points out that rates of pay have been frozen for 12 years, while costs have risen by 50% over the same period.

The CLSA is supporting the action, although it played no role in organising it.
Prominent criminal lawyer Rodney Warren says: “There’s just huge anger. This is about competitive tendering, the closure of law firms, not having fees raised, not being paid for travelling and waiting. People have had enough and the Legal Services Commission seems to be closing its ears.”

Issue: 7260 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll