header-logo header-logo

23 February 2015
Issue: 7642 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Criminal legal aid duty contract challenge fails

Criminal lawyers have failed in their court challenge against the Lord Chancellor’s decision to reduce the number of criminal legal aid contracts for police station duty work.

The London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association (LCCSA), Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association (CLSA) and a firm engaged in criminal legal aid work challenged the decision to shrink the contracts available from 1,800 to 527 and thereby consolidate the market. The Law Society brought a second challenge. 

An earlier legal challenge against the same decision, on the basis of failure to include two expert reports, succeeded in stalling the process in November 2014. The latest challenge was on the grounds that the Lord Chancellor failed to consider the investment costs required by firms “scaling up” to accept the new contracts and failed to disclose a full version of the ministry’s economic model.

However, the court rejected these arguments.

Bill Waddington, chair of the CLSA, and Jonathan Black, president of the LCCSA, said: “The impact on many of our members if this tender process goes ahead will be devastating. 

“Many firms have been considering their future in the new legal aid duty contracts market and cannot see a way forward.”

Both organisations and the Law Society plan to appeal.

 

Issue: 7642 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll