header-logo header-logo

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Criminal litigation

Crowch v DPP [2008] EWHC 948 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 205 (Apr)

Correction from last Law Digest (see NLJ 2 May 2007, pp 630–631). An order, under s 19(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, (POA 1985) for costs incurred as a result of an unnecessary or improper act or omission by or on behalf of a prosecutor cannot be made to compensate an unrepresented defendant for his own loss of time in preparing his case and attending court (the reasoning in R v Bedlington Magistrates’ Court ex p Wilkinson [1999] 164 JP 156, construing of POA 1985, s 16 applies equally to s 19).

                                                                              

Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll