header-logo header-logo

15 February 2008
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

Re Trinity Mirror Plc and others (A and B (Minors, acting by the Official Solicitor to the Supreme Court) Intervening) [2008] EWCA Crim 50, [2008] All ER (D) 12 (Feb)

For the purposes of the Supreme Court Act 1981, s 45(4) matters are “incidental to” the jurisdiction of the crown court only when the powers to be exercised relate to the proper dispatch of the business before it. The crown court has no general power to grant injunctions.

Unless the proposed injunction is directly linked to the exercise of the crown court’s jurisdiction and its statutory functions, the appropriate jurisdiction is lacking.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW—Nelson Wang

HFW strengthens global insurance practice and Greater China offering with London Partner hire

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon—David McEwing

Burges Salmon boosts Energy and Utilities practice with appointment of David McEwing

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson—Alexander Studholme

Browne Jacobson adds international construction arbitration partner in London push

NEWS
Law firm trainees are choosing US firms over their UK comparators, according to Chambers’ annual report on UK trainee satisfaction
A former senior judge has warned peers against scrapping juries for fraud and financial crimes, ahead of the Courts and Tribunals Bill’s second reading in the House of Lords this week
Civil practitioners face changes spanning debt recovery, workplace harassment and possession claims, alongside guidance on insolvency challenges and children proceedings

Finding matrimonial wealth is as challenging as dividing it, as family disputes draw practitioners into asset tracing, offshore structures and insolvency

Agreement between opponents offers no guarantee that a court will approve a retrospective increase to a costs budget
back-to-top-scroll