header-logo header-logo

20 April 2010
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

Remice v Governor of Belmarsh [2007] All ER (D) 439 (Mar)

The defendant was granted conditional bail.  The prosecution appealed to the Crown Court.  The judge refused bail and remanded the defendant in custody but did not set a return date for the defendant to appear again before the magistrates’ court. 

Held:  although ss 128 and 128A of the 1980 Act do not directly bind the Crown Court, a defendant should enjoy no lesser rights than he would have done had the prosecutor’s appeal not supervened. 

In the instant case, the Crown Court ought to have deployed the provisions of s 128A(2) and considered whether the claimant should have been remanded for more than eight days. If question was decided in the affirmative, he should have been allowed to make representations.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll