header-logo header-logo

Criminal Litigation

20 April 2007
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Amendment No.15 to the Consolidated Criminal Practice Direction

These changes came into force on Monday 2 April, 2007, adding: (a) a new direction about indictments (para IV 34), supplementing the new rules in Pt 14 of the Criminal Procedure Rules; (b) a new direction about ‘vulnerable defendants’ (para III 30), replacing para IV 39 of the Practice Direction and applying in both magistrates’ courts and the crown court; (c) a new direction about case management (para  IV 41), making new arrangements for the conduct of plea and case management hearings in the crown court.

The amendments introduce new forms: two forms of crown court indictment for use in connection with Pt 14 of the Rules (one for ordinary cases and the other for use in two-stage trials under ss 17–21 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004), a new form of application for a witness summons (Pt 28 of the Rules), and new case management forms for use at plea and case management hearings in the Crown Court and in magistrates’ courts.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll