header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

Amendment No.15 to the Consolidated Criminal Practice Direction

These changes came into force on Monday 2 April, 2007, adding: (a) a new direction about indictments (para IV 34), supplementing the new rules in Pt 14 of the Criminal Procedure Rules; (b) a new direction about ‘vulnerable defendants’ (para III 30), replacing para IV 39 of the Practice Direction and applying in both magistrates’ courts and the crown court; (c) a new direction about case management (para  IV 41), making new arrangements for the conduct of plea and case management hearings in the crown court.

The amendments introduce new forms: two forms of crown court indictment for use in connection with Pt 14 of the Rules (one for ordinary cases and the other for use in two-stage trials under ss 17–21 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004), a new form of application for a witness summons (Pt 28 of the Rules), and new case management forms for use at plea and case management hearings in the Crown Court and in magistrates’ courts.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll