header-logo header-logo

24 February 2021 / Alexander Layton KC , Andrew Dinsmore
Issue: 7922 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Cross-border civil litigation: the new normal

40726
Alexander Layton QC & Andrew Dinsmore examine the post-Brexit landscape for jurisdiction and enforcement of foreign judgments
  • An overview of the rules relating to civil and commercial matters in England and Wales following the UK’s departure from the EU.
  • Jurisdiction of the English courts is now generally governed by the rules which have hitherto applied to non-European cases.
  • Foreign judgments can only be enforced by an action at common law or under CPR 74.

Although the UK officially left the EU on 31 January 2020, Article 67 of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement 2019 meant that Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) continued to apply to civil and commercial proceedings commenced prior to the end of the transition period (namely, 31 December 2020).

The transition period has now ended without any deal between the UK and EU on civil justice, with the consequence that the EU’s rules on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments no longer apply.

This article

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll