header-logo header-logo

24 February 2021 / Alexander Layton KC , Andrew Dinsmore
Issue: 7922 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Cross-border civil litigation: the new normal

40726
Alexander Layton QC & Andrew Dinsmore examine the post-Brexit landscape for jurisdiction and enforcement of foreign judgments
  • An overview of the rules relating to civil and commercial matters in England and Wales following the UK’s departure from the EU.
  • Jurisdiction of the English courts is now generally governed by the rules which have hitherto applied to non-European cases.
  • Foreign judgments can only be enforced by an action at common law or under CPR 74.

Although the UK officially left the EU on 31 January 2020, Article 67 of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement 2019 meant that Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) continued to apply to civil and commercial proceedings commenced prior to the end of the transition period (namely, 31 December 2020).

The transition period has now ended without any deal between the UK and EU on civil justice, with the consequence that the EU’s rules on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments no longer apply.

This article

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll