header-logo header-logo

20 September 2013 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Cross roads

hires_14

Nicholas Dobson revisits the Highways Act regarding overlapping powers

Back in August 1965 Bob Dylan paid a rock music revisit to Highway 61—the famous “blues highway” running from New Orleans to Wyoming. More recently (if less rhythmically), the Supreme Court on 19 June 2013 revisited a decision of the Court of Appeal on overlapping local authority highway powers—ss 66 and 80 of the Highways Act 1980 (HA 1980).

In Cusack v London Borough of Harrow [2013] UKSC 40, Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Carnwath and Hughes found that where there are two separate statutory provisions which could apply, it is open to the local authority to rely on either provision, provided that it is reasonable in all the circumstances for it to do so. Substantive judgments were given by Lord Carnwath and Lord Neuberger (with whom Lord Sumption and Lord Hughes agreed).

The facts

The case concerned Mr Cusack who since 1969 had practised as a solicitor at 66 Station Road, Harrow. In 1973 Cusack had obtained temporary planning permission to use the ground floor of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll