header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 May 2021 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Public Order Act: crossing the (thin blue) line?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
48974
Public processions, public assemblies & extending police powers. Neil Parpworth discusses proposed changes to the provisions in the Public Order Act 1986
  • Public processions and public assemblies.
  • The power to impose conditions.
  • The subject matter of conditions.

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill (the PCSC Bill) received its First Reading in the House of Commons on 9 March 2021. At the time of writing, it has progressed to the Committee Stage. The Bill is a substantial piece of legislation which is concerned with a number of aspects of criminal law and the criminal justice system (see Michael Zander QC’s series ‘A Bill that has a bit of everything...’: Part 1, NLJ 26 March 2021, p9; Part 2, NLJ 2 & 9 April 2021, p17; and Part 3, NLJ 7 May 2021, p15). For present purposes, the focus will be on Pt 3 of the PCSC Bill relating to ‘Public Order’, in particular the clauses which are concerned with ‘public processions’ and ‘public assemblies’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
NLJ this week: Civil practice with claws & caution
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
NLJ this week: Stealing virtual gold?
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
NLJ this week: Don’t let your LPA gather dust
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll