header-logo header-logo

01 May 2024
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , ADR
printer mail-detail

Cruise claim couple urged to settle

Three Court of Appeal judges have urged a couple whose cruise in Arctic Canada was diverted due to icy conditions to ‘reach a pragmatic settlement’ rather than continue through the courts

Rosemary and Nicholas Sherman, who are representing themselves, booked a cruise to the Northwest Passage with travel company Reader Offers Ltd (ROL). They brought a claim for a refund and compensation after their ship missed the majority of advertised destinations, instead exploring the west coast of Greenland.

Handing down judgment last week in Sherman and another v Reader Offers Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 412, however, Lord Justice Males warned the couple that any compensation was likely to be ‘modest’.

Commenting on the proportionality of the case, he said: ‘I am concerned that a claim about a cruise in which nobody died or was injured or suffered any lasting damage has now occupied seven days in the County Court, two days in the High Court and a further two days in the Court of Appeal, and that a yet further hearing will be required before it can be concluded.

‘It is not for us to apportion responsibility for this… I would note, however, that the court has done what it could to help the parties to resolve this dispute without this time-consuming and expensive litigation.

‘As early as 18 February 2020, Deputy District Judge Loughbridge made an order that “At all stages the parties must consider settling this litigation by any means of Alternative Dispute Resolution (including Mediation)”.

‘Such orders are now increasingly common and must be taken seriously… we urged the parties to reach a pragmatic settlement so that they can put this case behind them… I would repeat that urging. Even now it is not too late.’

Both Lady Justice Asplin and Lord Justice Underhill also urged the parties to reach a pragmatic settlement.

Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll