header-logo header-logo

05 November 2009
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Custodial sentences for data protection breaches

Potential for up to two years in prison if government plans receive go ahead

Data protection breaches could lead to up to two years in prison, under plans mooted by the government.

Proposals to introduce custodial sentences are included in a Ministry of Justice consultation paper released last month, The knowing or reckless misuse of personal data. They would apply to individuals found guilty of knowingly or recklessly obtaining, disclosing, selling or procuring the disclosure of personal data without the consent of the data controller.

Offenders could be imprisoned for up to two years on indictment, and up to 12 months on summary conviction, in addition to unlimited fines on indictment or fines up to £5,000 on summary conviction.

There would be a defence available if the individual could show they acted for the purposes of journalism, or artistic or literary purposes, and with a reasonable belief that the obtaining, disclosing or procuring was in the public interest.

Tom Morrison, associate at Rollits, who specialises in data protection, says: “This has been a long time coming, but it does appear that the arrival of the new information commissioner has provided a renewed impetus to get custodial sentences on the books.

“Unlawful trading in personal information continues to make some people very rich. At the moment those individuals ‘only’ risk a criminal record and a fine. The theory is that if their liberty was also put at risk they might think twice before committing the offence.

“Bearing in mind that custodial sentences will be reserved for the worst offenders, a legitimate business which makes an accidental error in the handling of personal information has little to fear from the ministry’s latest proposals. Having said that it would be wrong to suggest that businesses can risk being complacent.

Morrison adds that in addition to the Ministry’s proposals and the Information Commissioner’s forthcoming new power to issues fines directly (in the form of monetary penalty notices), there remains a serious and genuine risk of reputational damage for any business which allows information about its employees or customers to be misused.

Former Advertising Standards Authority chief Christopher Graham took over the role of Information Commissioner in June.

 

Issue: 7392 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll