header-logo header-logo

24 October 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Tax
printer mail-detail

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Reeves is considering imposing a charge on people who use LLPs, as part of a tax raid on lawyers, accountants, locum doctors, doctors in private practice and other professionals such as consultants, The Times and other outlets reported this week. Current speculation suggests it would be set at less than the 15% rate of national insurance, could raise about £2bn per year and would affect LLPs only, not partnerships as a whole.

An LLP partner’s liability is limited to their investment and they are treated as self-employed for tax purposes so do not pay the 15% rate for employer national insurance contributions.

However, nobody will know for certain whether Reeves is kite-flying to test the idea or serious until budget day on 26 November.

David McNeill, the Law Society’s director of public affairs, said the alleged plan ‘makes no logical sense as a joined-up growth strategy.

‘Imposing a new tax on LLPs could be a big hit on the legal profession, a sector which the government is depending on as part of its growth strategy. Law partnerships don’t get the same tax breaks for investment as other businesses but are now having to pay the same levels of tax. On top of that, law firms are facing the risk of new regulation costs and bureaucracy’.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Tax
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll