header-logo header-logo

24 October 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Tax
printer mail-detail

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Reeves is considering imposing a charge on people who use LLPs, as part of a tax raid on lawyers, accountants, locum doctors, doctors in private practice and other professionals such as consultants, The Times and other outlets reported this week. Current speculation suggests it would be set at less than the 15% rate of national insurance, could raise about £2bn per year and would affect LLPs only, not partnerships as a whole.

An LLP partner’s liability is limited to their investment and they are treated as self-employed for tax purposes so do not pay the 15% rate for employer national insurance contributions.

However, nobody will know for certain whether Reeves is kite-flying to test the idea or serious until budget day on 26 November.

David McNeill, the Law Society’s director of public affairs, said the alleged plan ‘makes no logical sense as a joined-up growth strategy.

‘Imposing a new tax on LLPs could be a big hit on the legal profession, a sector which the government is depending on as part of its growth strategy. Law partnerships don’t get the same tax breaks for investment as other businesses but are now having to pay the same levels of tax. On top of that, law firms are facing the risk of new regulation costs and bureaucracy’.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Tax
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll