header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Custody deaths under spotlight

News

Human rights groups have hit out at plans to exempt prison and police custody from corporate manslaughter legislation.
The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill, which reached report stage in the House of Lords this week, creates an offence where gross corporate negligence leads to a person’s death in the workplace or in other settings.

However, while the legislation applies to police forces and government departments, as well as private companies, it excludes deaths in prison and police custody.

Now a coalition of law reform groups—JUSTICE, Liberty, the Prison Reform Trust and Inquest—has suggested a set of amendments to include deaths in prison and police custody in the offence.

Inquest’s casework service says there were more than 2,000 deaths in police and prison custody between 1995 and 2005, and claims that many of these deaths raise “issues of negligence, systemic failures to care for the vulnerable, institutional violence, racism, inhumane treatment and abuse of human rights”.

Despite a pattern of cases where inquest juries have found overwhelming evidence of unlawful and excessive use of force or gross neglect, no police or prison officer has been held responsible, either at an individual level or at a senior management level, for institutional and systemic failures to improve training and other policies. This is even the case when inquests return unlawful killing verdicts.

The coalition adds: “The government points to public inquiries as an alternative route to accountability—but it refused to hold public inquiries into the deaths of both Zahid Mubarek and Joseph Scholes.

“In both cases, the government fought the families’ attempts to have a public inquiry held in the civil courts. Without a legal victory by the family, the Zahid Mubarek Inquiry would not have been held.”

Sally Ireland, senior legal officer at JUSTICE, says: “The bottom line is that too many people—including children—are dying in custody and that the current law is not doing enough to prevent it.”

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll