header-logo header-logo

03 November 2011 / Professor Dominic Regan
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Cutting it

Dominic Regan returns to the consequences of the referral fee chop

My recent article about this topic provoked more interest than anything I have ever written. I return to the topic for much has happened since the government announced that it was going to ban the payment of referral fees.

Meanwhile, in a fiery talk delivered last month, Jack Straw stated that the claims management companies which thrive on the lucrative income generated by the commoditisation of claims would not be allowed to circumvent the law.

Self-referral

One possibility I anticipated in my earlier article has seemingly already happened. I understand that some claims companies have decided to buy into law firms and so maintain their income by referring the cases acquired to itself.

There has also been a remarkable change of nomenclature, with several bodies that were receiving referral fees now saying that it is a marketing or advertising fee instead. Those companies, such as Injury Lawyers 4U, which advertises

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll