header-logo header-logo

Cutting it

03 November 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan returns to the consequences of the referral fee chop

My recent article about this topic provoked more interest than anything I have ever written. I return to the topic for much has happened since the government announced that it was going to ban the payment of referral fees.

Meanwhile, in a fiery talk delivered last month, Jack Straw stated that the claims management companies which thrive on the lucrative income generated by the commoditisation of claims would not be allowed to circumvent the law.

Self-referral

One possibility I anticipated in my earlier article has seemingly already happened. I understand that some claims companies have decided to buy into law firms and so maintain their income by referring the cases acquired to itself.

There has also been a remarkable change of nomenclature, with several bodies that were receiving referral fees now saying that it is a marketing or advertising fee instead. Those companies, such as Injury Lawyers 4U, which advertises and then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll